Third Circuit Reverses Bankruptcy Court's Exercise of Jurisdiction Over Non-Debtors

In re Exide Techs., No. 07-2230, __ F.3d __ (3d Cir. Sept. 19, 2008)

The persistent question of when a bankruptcy court can exercise “core” jurisdiction over nondebtor vs. nondebtor disputes received close examination in a precedential opinion issued by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals on September 19, 2008.

Continue Reading...

In Calculating a Guarantor's Liability, the State Law Applicable to the Guaranty, Rather than the Law Applicable to the Underlying Loan Agreements, Governs

In re Stone & Webster, Inc., 354 B.R. 686 (D. Del. 2006) (Judge Sue L. Robinson)

This was a case of contract interpretation and choice of law issues, in connection with a determination of damages owed by a guarantor to a lender. The lender argued that the law to be applied was the Bankruptcy Code and Delaware law, because of the venue of the case; the guarantor argued in favor of the Saudi Arabian law selected in the underlying credit agreement. The court found that New York law, the law chosen in the guaranty, applied.

Continue Reading...